Hi! There is consensus to adopt this draft as a working group item. This might not be the exact form it ends up in, but there is sufficient interest to get the work started. I'll work with the authors to migrate to the official repository and submit an updated draft.
spt > On Oct 25, 2024, at 03:46, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > At the TLS meeting at IETF 119 we discussed the Large Record Sizes for TLS > and DTLS I-D; see [0] and [1]. There has been some list discussion; see [2] > and [3]. The I-D has been revised a few times since IETF 119 to incorporate > list feedback. This message is to judge consensus on whether there is support > to adopt this I-D. If you support adoption and are willing to review and > contribute text, please send a message to the list. If you do not support > adoption of this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. > This call will close on November 7, 2024. > > Thanks, > Deirdre, Joe, and Sean > > [0] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mattsson-tls-super-jumbo-record-limit/ > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/slides-119-tls-large-record-sizes-for-tls-and-dtls-00 > > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ZnGzqIWOkpm_F6zaqAxxtReHpVg/ > [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/cRH9x6nbLeAnkG-fhOS3ASDA3oU/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
