On 18/10/2024 02:30, Sean Turner wrote:
Whoops - Corrected!
I'm still not seeing minutes? > The summary is that the process described in the slides is > basically the right shape. I'm either misinterpreting that or disagree with you. Not sure which. ISTM the concerns about anonymous influence on the standards process wasn't covered in the slides, nor your conclusion, and fixing that would seem like a significant change, so I guess you'd have called that out were it the case. If the FATT process still has anonymous reviewers, IMO it is still broken. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
