I do not think we need to make Curve25519 MTI. The purpose of MTIs is to provide a minimum baseline for interoperability, and we have that already with the existing MTI. That's entirely compatible with most people preferring X25519 because they believe it's better than the MTI.
-Ekr On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:26 AM David Adrian <davad...@umich.edu> wrote: > I also support *not* making Curve 25519 MTI. > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:18 AM Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote: > >> My feelings exactly match Rich's here. >> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:15 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz= >> 40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >>> I am also opposed to the merge. 8446bis changes are editorial and >>> clarifications, not semantic ones. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
