+1 what Rich said. Not a deal-breaker for me either way, but I would prefer 
"N", initially.

Cheers,

Andrei

-----Original Message-----
From: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 7:26 AM
To: Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com>; TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS]Re: Working Group Last Call for Legacy 
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 codepoints for TLS 1.3

> This email starts the working group last call for "Legacy RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 
> codepoints for TLS 1.3” I-D, located here:

No comments, ship it.

> The only comment/question I have about this I-D (and I hope this is not too 
> much of a bikeshed) is whether the Recommended column should be “D” instead 
> of “N”.

I think that would be a mistake as it makes the vast deployment of existing TPM 
machines nonconformant.  In a few years, maybe. For now, not-recommended is 
strong enough.


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to