+1 what Rich said. Not a deal-breaker for me either way, but I would prefer "N", initially.
Cheers, Andrei -----Original Message----- From: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 7:26 AM To: Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com>; TLS List <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS]Re: Working Group Last Call for Legacy RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 codepoints for TLS 1.3 > This email starts the working group last call for "Legacy RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 > codepoints for TLS 1.3” I-D, located here: No comments, ship it. > The only comment/question I have about this I-D (and I hope this is not too > much of a bikeshed) is whether the Recommended column should be “D” instead > of “N”. I think that would be a mistake as it makes the vast deployment of existing TPM machines nonconformant. In a few years, maybe. For now, not-recommended is strong enough. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org