> On May 22, 2024, at 10:28, David Benjamin <david...@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:27 AM Salz, Rich > <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > This email starts the working group last call for "Legacy RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 > > codepoints for TLS 1.3” I-D, located here: > > No comments, ship it. > > > The only comment/question I have about this I-D (and I hope this is not too > > much of a bikeshed) is whether the Recommended column should be “D” instead > > of “N”. > > I think that would be a mistake as it makes the vast deployment of existing > TPM machines nonconformant. In a few years, maybe. For now, not-recommended > is strong enough. > > (I don't have strong feelings on this and am happy to defer this to what > everyone else wants. Just briefly noting that "N" in the document isn't an > explicit preference here. "D" just didn't exist at the time the document was > written.)
I figured this was the case. Part of the reason for raising this point now is to tell the IESG that we actually thought about it when somebody asks about whether we considered “D”. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
