I think it is ready and can live with the current draft. I agree with Watson Ladd that the ordering is awkward. If you get past that part, it all works, but you have to read the whole thing before you really get it. Then, you must start in the middle to begin your implementation. I guess the criticism is that it's not a very good guide as you implement, but it all makes sense as you try things in a different order than the draft indicates.
I also believe there was supposed to be some formal proof work done, and I'm not sure that's complete. thanks, Rob On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:00 PM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > This is the working group last call for TLS Encrypted Client Hello [1]. > Please indicate if you think the draft is ready to progress to the IESG and > send any comments to the list by 31 March 2024. The comments sent by > Watson Ladd to the list [2] on 17 February 2024 will be considered last > call comments. > > Thanks, > > Joe, Deirdre, and Sean > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-esni/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/XUCFuNBSQfSJclkhLW-14DZ0ETg/ > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
