On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:16 PM Muhammad Usama Sardar < muhammad_usama.sar...@tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> On 17.02.24 17:31, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > As I understand it, you think that the changes we made in PR#185 may > > have been unnecessary > > and that it would be good to have more analysis of that. Is that > > roughly correct? > > Yes, except that the relevant PR is #875. Since there is silence for > last 2 months on the thread that I started, I assume nobody has any > further insights on the matter, and thus it will be good to have more > analysis. > I wouldn't object to more analysis, but given the relatively narrow remit of this document and that changing the key schedule would obviously create wire format incompatibilities, I wouldn't want to do that absent some evidence that the change was insecure as opposed to unnecessary. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
