On 17.02.24 17:31, Eric Rescorla wrote:
As I understand it, you think that the changes we made in PR#185 may have been unnecessary and that it would be good to have more analysis of that. Is that roughly correct?
Yes, except that the relevant PR is #875. Since there is silence for last 2 months on the thread that I started, I assume nobody has any further insights on the matter, and thus it will be good to have more analysis.
Usama _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
