Yes On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:15 AM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> Joe, > > Does this mean that this draft will be held pending resolution on that > proposal? > > -Ekr > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:51 AM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > >> The working group last call for RFC8773bis has completed >> (draft-ietf-tls-8773bis). There was general support for moving the document >> forward and upgrading its status. However, several working group >> participants raised the concern that formal analysis has not been conducted >> on this modification to the TLS protocol. We should at least have consensus >> on whether this document has the required analysis before upgrading it, but >> we also need a more general statement on this requirement since the TLS >> working group currently does not have a policy for what does and does not >> need formal analysis or what constitutes proper formal analysis. >> >> The chairs are working on a proposal for handling situations like this >> that we plan to post to the list in a week or so. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joe, Deirdre, and Sean >> > _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
