Joe, Does this mean that this draft will be held pending resolution on that proposal?
-Ekr On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 7:51 AM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > The working group last call for RFC8773bis has completed > (draft-ietf-tls-8773bis). There was general support for moving the document > forward and upgrading its status. However, several working group > participants raised the concern that formal analysis has not been conducted > on this modification to the TLS protocol. We should at least have consensus > on whether this document has the required analysis before upgrading it, but > we also need a more general statement on this requirement since the TLS > working group currently does not have a policy for what does and does not > need formal analysis or what constitutes proper formal analysis. > > The chairs are working on a proposal for handling situations like this > that we plan to post to the list in a week or so. > > Thanks, > > Joe, Deirdre, and Sean > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
