Martin, You haven’t formed a complete sentence here. That’s usually allowable, but not in this instance.
Uri said there might be “special cases”. Anyone can make TLS 1.2 PQ, it just won’t be called TLS. thanks, Rob On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 17:56 Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023, at 10:23, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Of course. We’re not the protocol police and nobody from the IETF will > > come and arrest anyone who uses Kyber-based key exchange in TLS 1.2 But > > with this document, they will not be able to register such an algorithm > > for 1.2 > > I don’t think we can go that far. Our registry policies would allow > someone else to define something PQC-ish we are only saying that we > .intend. to not define something with “official” standing. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
