At least one bit of work: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3548606.3559360
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023, 3:23 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > What do we have in terms of formal analysis for this extension? > > -Ekr > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:40 AM Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > >> I think this should move forward. I am encouraged that at least two >> people have spoken to me about their implementations. >> >> Russ >> >> On Nov 29, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: >> >> RFC 8773 (TLS 1.3 Extension for Certificate-Based Authentication with an >> External Pre-Shared Key) was originally published as experimental due to >> lack of implementations. As part of implementation work for the EMU >> workitem draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls which uses RFC 8773 there is >> ongoing implementation work. Since the implementation status of RFC 8773 is >> changing, this is a consensus call to move RFC 8773 to standards track as >> reflected in [RFC8773bis]( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-8773bis). This will also >> help avoid downref for the EMU draft. Please indicate if you approve of or >> object to this transition to standards track status by December 15, 2023. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joe, Sean, and Deirdre >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
