What do we have in terms of formal analysis for this extension? -Ekr
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:40 AM Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > I think this should move forward. I am encouraged that at least two > people have spoken to me about their implementations. > > Russ > > On Nov 29, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > > RFC 8773 (TLS 1.3 Extension for Certificate-Based Authentication with an > External Pre-Shared Key) was originally published as experimental due to > lack of implementations. As part of implementation work for the EMU > workitem draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls which uses RFC 8773 there is > ongoing implementation work. Since the implementation status of RFC 8773 is > changing, this is a consensus call to move RFC 8773 to standards track as > reflected in [RFC8773bis]( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-8773bis). This will also > help avoid downref for the EMU draft. Please indicate if you approve of or > object to this transition to standards track status by December 15, 2023. > > Thanks, > > Joe, Sean, and Deirdre > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
