Hi Marco, On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Marco Tiloca <marco.til...@ri.se> wrote: > Thank you, the PR looks good me!
Cool, we'll merge it then, and publish an updated version soon. > Right, I was thinking of spelling out how the initiator should behave if the > responder does not comply with the specification. > > If that can be excluded altogether or a safe behavior at the responder is > obvious/implied, then the current text is just fine. Thanks for clarifying your point. It looks to me that your concern is more about the quality of implementations rather than strict protocol requirements. So, for now, I think it's safe to leave ยง7.* as-is. cheers & thanks again! _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
