The points brought up in this thread have already been discussed, after which the chairs decided there was rough consensus to deprecate FFDHE and RSA and moved the document to WGLC. In particular, Hubert suggested last December to add a warning that FFDHE should be preferred over RSA, even though the document deprecates both of them: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SPqcyUajXPVqmHiyEHm-d5JWfbw/
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:41 AM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL < u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > AFAIK, they aren’t on TLS 1.3, at least so far. > > Regards, > Uri > > > On Jul 14, 2023, at 12:54, Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> > wrote: > > > > !-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > This Message Is From an External Sender > > This message came from outside the Laboratory. > > |-------------------------------------------------------------------! > > > > Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu> writes: > > > >> I’m aware of at least one company (using the term loosely) that uses > custom > >> group, > > > > How does that work with TLS 1.3? > > > > Peter. > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
