>This appears in s2: >Note that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are deprecated by [RFC8996] >and TLS 1.3 does not support FFDH [RFC8446]. >You’re suggesting that this be moved to s1?
My main point is say it once, not repeat it in each section. > If that’s the case then maybe make Appendix B normative (and resort the > Appendices), list the Y->N changes above in s5, and leave the rest > informative (since they’re already or will be N)? That's a good idea. > And, we should probably change the name of the Appendices from “XXX Cipher > Suites Deprecated by This Document” to “Deprecated XXX Cipher Suites” to not > mislead readers that this document did all the deprecation. But, I do like > the idea of adding a reference to this document for all the registry entries > listed in Appendices - kind of like a tombstone. And two more good ideas. In one email: an IETF record perhaps. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
