On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 5:43 AM Ashley Kopman <akop...@conceptsbeyond.com> wrote:
> As far as approval, it is our hope that this can become an IETF standard. > Aviation for a long time has relied on custom one-off solutions and is > trying to use standardized solutions. ICAO has agreed to move forward with > this approach contingent on its publication as a standard. I am new to this > process, so please correct me if I have misunderstood, but I believe the > first step in possibly becoming a standard is to have this work adopted by > this group. > That is one way to do it, and the process usually used if a document attracts a lot of interest (a call for adoption). This draft seems uncontroversial but maybe not of wide interest. You should probably discuss it with the AD and the chairs, if you haven't already done so. One thing to keep in mind is that IETF bureaucratic processes are usually deliberately underspecified, so it's difficult to game them. This can be confusing to newcomers, but I think it's ultimately a good thing. It doesn't mean you're doing anything wrong. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
