Hi,
We presented this work at IETF 114. Thank you to everyone who provided
feedback.
I have removed the extensibility to future path validation types and limited
the scope of this extension to just SCVP. I have also added discussion on how
the server should handle it if other path validation extensions are added in
the future (at the end of Section 2). Version 03 is available for review
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-segers-tls-cert-validation-ext-03.html
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-segers-tls-cert-validation-ext-03.html>
I am new to the IETF, so I apologize in advance if this is not the correct
process, but I believe the next step is to ask that this draft be considered
for adoption by the TLS Working Group.
Thank you,
Ashley Kopman
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
