Hiya,
On 07/08/2022 21:58, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote:
Hence, what we are proposing is no less secure than what we are currently doing now.
Well, except there'll be a whole pile of new code, which is a fine way to be less secure. Now for key establishment that's not too bad perhaps, but when I hear some of the certificate proposals (in lamps, not really this wg), I just shudder. S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
