On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 1:59 PM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > Actually, we came up with the concept while evaluating PAKEs for the CFRG, > and in the that context, it makes sense. The problem is that the term "Quantum Annoyance" is an equivocation. > you're still "mostly safe". > Like this phrase. I don't really have a strong opinion on these matters, but it seems like too much hand waving to me. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
