Hi! The chairs are going to declare that there is rough consensus to adopt draft-farrell-tls-wkesni as a WG item to address. There a couple of things to note:
1. While there were only a few who responded during this WG call for adoption, there were others at dispatch and dnsops who also said they would review. We are including those people in our assessment. 2. Ben provided a number of comments [1] that, after WG discussion, may result in a change of direction. That change of direction may be subtle or dramatic. Cheers, Chris, Joe, & Sean [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lcSUgcRwSoL66FfQsVfxEUwxt7k/ > On Jun 8, 2022, at 14:17, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > The author of "A well-known URI for publishing ECHConfigList values" [0] > presented at IETF 113 in dispatch [1]. He was directed to dnsop, but dnsop > passed on adopting the I-D. To explore the 2nd option suggested by dispatch, > please send a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 23 June 2022 that indicates: > > 1) Whether you are willing to review and contribute to this I-D, and > 2) Whether you support adopting this I-D as a WG item. > > Please include any additional information that is helpful in understanding > your position. > > Thanks, > Joe and Sean > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrell-tls-wkesni/ > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-dispatch-a-well-known-url-for-publishing-echconfiglists-00 _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
