On Wed 2022-06-08 14:17:03 -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > 1) Whether you are willing to review and contribute to this I-D, and > 2) Whether you support adopting this I-D as a WG item. > > Please include any additional information that is helpful in understanding > your position. > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrell-tls-wkesni/ > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-dispatch-a-well-known-url-for-publishing-echconfiglists-00
I am willing to review and comment on this I-D, and I believe it should
be adopted by the WG. Having a reasonable and standardized way to
publish and retrieve ECH config information is critical to making ECH
effective, and having full WG discussion about how the mechanisms work
(and how they interact with different possible ECH architectures) is
worthwhile.
I think we'll only get that level of full consideration with WG
adoption of this draft.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
