Fine by me. > On Feb 24, 2021, at 10:07 AM, Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> wrote: > > The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official target > for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's copy of > the draft is below: > > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt > > Given the size of the diff, and the recent update to HPKE to prepare it for > IRSG review, I'd like to propose that we cut -10 (when the datatracker opens) > and use that as the new interop target. This will resolve the moving HPKE > target going forward and let that part of the protocol stabilize. > > What do other implementers think? > > Thanks, > Chris (no hat) > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
