Hey Stephen, I'd imagine the CF server will stay at ECH-10 through IETF 110.
Best, Chris P. On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:13 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 24/02/2021 18:07, Christopher Wood wrote: > > The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official > target for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's > copy of the draft is below: > > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt > > > > Given the size of the diff, and the recent update to HPKE to prepare it > for IRSG review, I'd like to propose that we cut -10 (when the datatracker > opens) and use that as the new interop target. This will resolve the moving > HPKE target going forward and let that part of the protocol stabilize. > > > > What do other implementers think? > > That's generally ok, but from my POV it would be > better to give it another week or two before we > do that, e.g. maybe just after IETF-110 or so. > > Reason is I've nearly but not quite got -09 > interop between (currently mega-hacked;-) OpenSSL > code and the NSS client, and then hopefully > the CF server and would prefer have that done > before we start moving the target again. > > OTOH, if the CF -09 server were to remain > available for a bit, then I'd be fine with > this change at any time. > > Cheers, > S. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Chris (no hat) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
