Good catch. I have filed https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1208 to address it.
-Ekr On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:29 AM John Mattsson <john.mattsson= 40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I think Section 6.1 Closure Alerts is a bit unclear: > > First it is stated the user_canceled SHOULD be followed by close_notify > > "This alert SHOULD be followed by a "close_notify"." > > Then it is stated that it MUST be followed by close_notify > > "Each party MUST send a "close_notify" alert before closing its write > side of the connection, > unless it has already sent some error alert." > > And in the same section is is stated that any data folloing user_canceled > MUST be ignored. > > "Any data received after a closure alert has been received MUST be > ignored." > > This seems quite contradicting to me. I don't know what the correct > behavior would be, > but unless I misunderstood something, it looks like it should be addressed > in rfc8446bis. > > Cheers, > John > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
