Hi, I think Section 6.1 Closure Alerts is a bit unclear:
First it is stated the user_canceled SHOULD be followed by close_notify "This alert SHOULD be followed by a "close_notify"." Then it is stated that it MUST be followed by close_notify "Each party MUST send a "close_notify" alert before closing its write side of the connection, unless it has already sent some error alert." And in the same section is is stated that any data folloing user_canceled MUST be ignored. "Any data received after a closure alert has been received MUST be ignored." This seems quite contradicting to me. I don't know what the correct behavior would be, but unless I misunderstood something, it looks like it should be addressed in rfc8446bis. Cheers, John _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
