Hi Tom,
On 10/11/2020 11:33, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 10/11/2020 11:30, tom petch wrote:Perhaps a second look at the algorithm to work out why these got missed to get a fix on how many more there may be.Sure, that's reasonable. (Mightn't be today.)
Just did that check by comparing [1] to the RFCs referenced in the draft and best I can see only 5953 and 6353 were missing in the end. I'd argue it's ok to add those without re-doing the IETF LC as they were mentioned in early on, in the LC, but of course that's the AD's call. I'm doing the edits for draft-10 now so it'll pop out shortly. Cheers, S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4347/referencedby/
Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
