> On Nov 10, 2020, at 05:21, tom petch <daedu...@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> I am confused about the treatment here of DTLS.
> 
> The Abstract seems clear about the proposed action for TLS but then the 
> second paragraph has
> " This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC6347)"
> 
> Mmmm, really?

Sorry for any confusion introduced as a result of this typo. DTLS 1.0 is 
RFC4347 not RFC 6347; RFC 6347 is DTLS 1.2.

OLD:

This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC6347)

NEW:

This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC4347)

spt

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to