Stephen,

I don't think what you're complaining about can be attributed to GitHub. Tools 
are just tools, how they're used is what's relevant (i.e., this could just as 
easily happen over e-mail).

Cheers,


> On 28 Oct 2020, at 7:31 am, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> The latest ECH draft from Oct 16 says "ECH uses draft-05 of
> HPKE for public key encryption."
> 
> The latest HPKE draft (-06) from Oct 23 has a few minor
> incompatible changes (for good but relatively trivial
> reasons).
> 
> So for interop ECH apparently requires use of an outdated
> I-D, despite the one week difference in publishing and
> a common co-author.
> 
> It seems a bit mad that all that githubbery results in
> such a lack of co-ordination in two closely related
> specs.
> 
> Anyway, I can manage to handle both HPKE-05 and
> HPKE-06 but this seems like yet another case where
> there is too much githubbery going on with the result
> that two closely linked drafts with a common co-author
> end up out of whack despite being issued within a week
> of one another.
> 
> That and the velocity of discussion and changes on
> github are a major disincentive (for me) for implementing
> ECH. I simply do not have the cycles to keep up with it
> as it has been happening these last months. If that were
> the goal of the authors and those endlessly commenting on
> github (and I do not believe it is), then they would be
> close to reaching that goal.
> 
> Can we not please freeze this stuff for at least long
> enough to get implementations done and somewhat tested?
> 
> Frankly, I expect my plea here to be more or less ignored
> just as my previous entreaties were. I decided to send
> it anyway on the basis that the perhaps what seems like
> an obvious failure of the current approach (ECH can't
> interop unless you use an outdated I-D for HPKE) might
> show that all this apparent high velocity discussion on
> github is not as effetcive as claimed (in at least this
> case).
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to