On 09/04/2020, 14:20, "Eric Rescorla" <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > Assuming I understand Hanno's proposal, I do not believe that this is > in fact an improvement, as it does not cover the important case where > the record containing the SH is lost and then the rest of the messages > from the server are uninterpretable.
I don't want to speak for Hanno here but the refinement proposed in [1], specifically the bit that says: [...] They may also proactively retransmit parts of a flight early if an ACK message indicates a gap. should cover the case you mention I think. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/w2nEYEB3ZMs5bzejqcHVEO-OBVQ/ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
