> On Feb 29, 2020, at 22:19, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 04:29:38PM -0800, David Schinazi wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:57 PM Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:40:43PM -0800, David Schinazi wrote: >>>> However, I don't think we should add a second count in this extension. >>>> Allowing ticket reuse is not something we have consensus for in the >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Did I miss a consensus call or something? >> >> To clarify what I said: I meant that there has not been a consensus >> call here, and additionally I've heard that some folks would like to >> enable ticket reuse, whereas some other folks are very opposed to any >> kind of reuse. >> >> In other words, I meant "we do not have consensus to allow reuse"; I >> did not mean "we have consensus to not allow reuse". > > I don't think even that is correct. Without a consensus call we don't > know. Viktor has raised serious concerns and a simple fix. > >> I'm not a TLS WG chair, I cannot judge consensus here. I was simply >> noting that there indeed had not been a consensus call on this topic. >> >> Furthermore, I still think the topic of reuse is out of scope for >> draft-ietf-tls-ticket-request. > > Well, you think so, and I don't. Now what?
The chair step in. Stay tuned. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
