On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 04:29:38PM -0800, David Schinazi wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:57 PM Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:40:43PM -0800, David Schinazi wrote: > > > However, I don't think we should add a second count in this extension. > > > Allowing ticket reuse is not something we have consensus for in the > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Did I miss a consensus call or something? > > To clarify what I said: I meant that there has not been a consensus > call here, and additionally I've heard that some folks would like to > enable ticket reuse, whereas some other folks are very opposed to any > kind of reuse. > > In other words, I meant "we do not have consensus to allow reuse"; I > did not mean "we have consensus to not allow reuse".
I don't think even that is correct. Without a consensus call we don't know. Viktor has raised serious concerns and a simple fix. > I'm not a TLS WG chair, I cannot judge consensus here. I was simply > noting that there indeed had not been a consensus call on this topic. > > Furthermore, I still think the topic of reuse is out of scope for > draft-ietf-tls-ticket-request. Well, you think so, and I don't. Now what? Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
