> On Jan 31, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If the scope of a document can be continually expanded during last call, it
> can be indefinitely postponed.
I'm not proposing a change of scope. The document specifies how a client
and server negotiate the number of tickets the server should send. This
remains the case. The -04 document leaves out a relevant scenario where
the client does want tickets to be refreshed (so not unconditionally zero),
but does not want gratuitous tickets (new one each time).
The scope of the document per the abstract includes the following:
This extension aims to provide a means for
servers to determine the number of tickets to generate in order to
reduce ticket waste, while simultaneously priming clients for future
connection attempts
My proposal falls squarely in the "in order to reduce ticket waste" category.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
