On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:43 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, at 11:54, Nick Sullivan wrote: > > At IETF 106, we discussed adding the ability to advertise specific > > signature algorithms for use in DCs without requiring clients to have > > to support these signature algorithms in leaf certificates. > > Is the intent with supporting an empty extension to support backward > compatibility? I think that deployed implementations can probably just > change to use the list so that we don't have to include this additional > flexibility. I'd prefer to always have a list. > Even simpler. Once we have a pre-allocated codepoint, the can be released without conflict with deployed code. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
