At IETF 105, ekr presented cTLS (Compact TLS) [0][1][2] to both the TLS WG and the LAKE BOF, which is now a chartered WG [3]. After some discussions, the ADs suggested [4] that the TLS WG consider whether this draft be adopted as a TLS WG item. LAKE could then later specify/refer/adopt/profile it, as appropriate. The authors revised cTLS and presented the revised draft at IETF 106 [5]. At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of cTLS as a WG item. To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why).
NOTE: : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions. We would have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is progressing out of the WG. Thanks, Chris, Joe, and Sean [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-105-tls-sessa-ctls/ [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/ [2] https://github.com/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/ [4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/kACwW7PXrmTRa4PvXQ0TA34xCvk [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tls-compact-tls-13-00.pdf _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
