On 28/02/2019 13:54, Salz, Rich wrote: > * Obviously, individuals should feel free to review this document or not > as they please, but I'm not seeing any compelling reason why TLS-WG should > take it on > > +1 to all EKR said.
Same here. S > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
