On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:54 PM Jack Visoky <jmvis...@ra.rockwell.com> wrote:
> TLS Colleagues, > > If you recall we discussed a draft for authentication only ciphersuites > over email back in August of 2018. We've since made some updates to that > draft. We also have gotten IANA assignments to the authentication only > ciphersuites for TLS 1.3 and have updated the draft to reflect the new > assignments. > > To that extent, as the IoT community is looking to adopt these > ciphersuites, we would like to solicit review of the draft: > > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-camwinget-tls-ts13-macciphersuites-02 > > > > and request that it be published as informational draft given that the IoT > forums are looking to adopt its use and the draft can serve as the guide > for use and interoperability. > It seems to me that there four somewhat distinct questions: 1. Code points 2. Document level (Info, Exp, PS, etc.) 3. Recommended status 4. WG status >From my perspective, you have code points and you've asked for an Informational document, but than can only get you Not Recommended, so what's the value of having this be a WG document? Why can't you submit it to the ISE or alternately just have people reference the draft? -Ekr > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > > > --Jack (and Nancy) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
