When your revisions are ready please post them to the list in OLD and NEW
format so the working group can evaluate them.

Thanks,

Joe

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@nomountain.net
> wrote:

> On 4/18/18 10:22 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> > Concerns have been raised about the trade-offs associated with pinning
> > and I do not think we currently have consensus to add pinning.  While I
> > think it may be possible to come to consensus on pinning I think it may
> > take some time.  I believe we can quickly get consensus for the
> > following approach:
> >
> > 1. Scope the document to the assertive use cases
> > 2. Explicitly allow (but do not require) DoE be included
> > 3. Remove current text about pinning
> > 4. Re-submit the document for publication and start work on a separate
> > extension that supports pinning
>
> This sounds reasonable.  I'll talk with co-editors about text
> changes.
>
> Melinda
>
> --
> Software longa, hardware brevis
>
> PGP fingerprint: 4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
>                  34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to