On 4/18/18 10:22 AM, Joseph Salowey wrote: > Concerns have been raised about the trade-offs associated with pinning > and I do not think we currently have consensus to add pinning. While I > think it may be possible to come to consensus on pinning I think it may > take some time. I believe we can quickly get consensus for the > following approach: > > 1. Scope the document to the assertive use cases > 2. Explicitly allow (but do not require) DoE be included > 3. Remove current text about pinning > 4. Re-submit the document for publication and start work on a separate > extension that supports pinning
This sounds reasonable. I'll talk with co-editors about text
changes.
Melinda
--
Software longa, hardware brevis
PGP fingerprint: 4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
