> On Mar 26, 2018, at 18:18, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>  IANA noted that this is effectively the
> same as closing the registries in terms of the difficulty of making
> further registrations, though I am not sure that the authors replied to
> the question that I think I asked about what the procedure is for
> re-opening a registry should a need arise to allocate an additional
> codepoint from it.

I’ll have to ask, but I suspect that someone who wanted a new assignment would 
draft an I-D that assigned the code point and it would go through the process.  
I.e., I think it’s mostly symbolic.

spt
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to