On 03/26/2018 12:24 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > Is it now impossible adding new things to TLS 1.2? I don't believe the WG > understood that this would be the situation. So I disagree with your claim > that this was our understanding of the situation.
I was under the impression that the WG was well aware, e.g., in my comments on the 2nd WGLC, where I say "It looks like we no longer do anything to obsolete/reserve/similar the HashAlgorithm and SignatureAlgorithm registries; was that just an editorial mixup or an intended change?", and Ekr replies with a link to the appropriate section of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates, as seen at https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg23865.html > Okay, it turns out that David's neat hack make some things harder. So what? > I thought that's what I was asking you -- you seem to feel that we should care about this, and I still don't understand why. -Ben _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
