On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip]
> > On 19 Mar 2018, at 7:32, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> > wrote: > > So if this technology were deployed on a network where not all parties > > are mutually trusting, it would offer network users a choice between > > surveillance by the network on the one hand (opt-in) and censorship on > > the other (opt-out and be blocked). Is that right? > > I see it a little differently. Your computer or my computer, both of which > are not configured to opt-in, should not be on such networks. In the > corporate world, there could be a production network that enforces this and > has access to corporate resources. There will usually also be a “guest” > network with unfiltered connectivity, but no access to internal databases.. > This is where visitors go, but also where employee phones connect. > > Of course the government of Elbonia might require all networks to have > this feature, and then you’ll have to decide if you want to configure your > laptop to opt-in. I would prefer to stay off-line while I’m in Elbonia in > that case. > That seems like notably less of an option for the citizens of Elbonia. -- Eric -- konklone.com | @konklone <https://twitter.com/konklone>
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
