> On Mar 14, 2018, at 10:52 PM, Artyom Gavrichenkov <xima...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 14 Mar. 2018 г., 22:32 Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com > <mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com>>: > >> On Mar 13, 2018, at 7:45 PM, Artyom Gavrichenkov <xima...@gmail.com >> <mailto:xima...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> 13 Mar. 2018 г., 18:38 Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com >> <mailto:mel...@fugue.com>>: >> One strategy that's very effective for overcoming resistance to bad ideas is >> to keep pushing the idea until nobody who's resisting it can afford to >> continue doing so. >> >> There's a name for that tactics, it's called "consensus by exhaustion". (On >> the recent GNSO meeting this was briefly discussed as an issue within ICANN.) > > And there is a name for this sort of labeling - it's called an "ad hominem > attack". I don't believe anyone is employing "consensus by exhaustion". > Please don't attach unwarranted labels to honest attempts to explain > requirements and develop solutions. > > I didn't! Ted has just pointed out that there's some strategy which is by the > way effective under some circumstances, and I've just recalled it has a name. > No labels attached!
Ah, OK, sorry for the incorrect inference! In my opinion some people may be misreading a good faith effort to explain the problem, listen to feedback and develop a solution as pushing an idea until the opponents can't afford to keep participating. Please accept that good faith effort at face value... - Ralph
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
