> On 13 Mar 2018, at 14:21, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Just to be clear: I'm still waiting for the chairs and/or > AD to explain how the proposed discussion of this draft > is consistent with IETF processes, given the results of > the discussion in Prague (a very clear lack of consensus > to even work on this topic), and the discussion of the > -00 version of this late last year. IOW, I don't consider > my objection has been answered.
Stephen, the opposite PoV is equally valid. There was no consensus in Prague NOT to work on the topic. The mood of the room was evenly divided. IIRC the supporters of draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13 agreed to drop that draft and come back with a new one which would hopefully be more likely to get WG consensus. That draft has now arrived. It’s unreasonable to deny the new I-D a fair hearing and even worse to reject it out of hand.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
