On 25 Oct 2017, at 15:37, Richard Barnes wrote:
Sorry, what? The current draft proposes an extension, literally the opposite of a standard, supported feature.
I agree with Stephen on this (narrow) point. The draft is on Standards Track, which means is proposes a standard. The fact that it is an "extension" is irrelevant in TLS: lots of things that are part of the standard; see Section 4.2 draft-ietf-tls-tls13.
It's explicitly optional.
I can find nothing in the draft that says that.
I don't really have a dog in this fight, but let's please be accurate.
Agree on both counts. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
