On 25/10/17 23:37, Richard Barnes wrote: > Sorry, what? The current draft proposes an extension, literally the > opposite of a standard, supported feature. It's explicitly optional.
Optional is not the opposite of standard.
See the intended status below.
> I don't really have a dog in this fight, but let's please be accurate.
Accuracy level is just fine I think.
S.
Network Working Group R. Housley
Internet-Draft Vigil Security
Intended status: Standards Track R. Droms
Expires: April 2, 2018 Interisle Consulting
September 29, 2017
TLS 1.3 Option for Negotiation of Visibility in the Datacenter
draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
