1.  If staying with TLS 1.2 indefinitely was considered acceptable,  would we 
even be having these discussions?

DAMMIT.  Stop saying indefinitely.

What percentage of hosts within your enterprise use TLS 1.2 as the preferred 
protocol?


  1.  Modifying Server,  application and logging infrastructure is a huge, 
expensive proposition,  that executive management would not be receptive to at 
all.   Not to mention the logistics to follow if they were.

And this is probably the main point behind all this.  Folks want to make the 
entire Internet less secure (I’ve explained why) so that they can save time and 
money.

But even if that were not the issue, do you think this draft won’t require 
custom work?

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to