I also support both time here and a "let's put all the bad breaking TLS ideas in one draft".
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 17:52 Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > I support allocating a time slot for the arguments against the draft-green > (and similar/related approaches). > > I also support documenting the above arguments, possibly in a TLS WG draft. > -- > Regards, > Uri Blumenthal > > On 7/13/17, 08:00, "TLS on behalf of Stephen Farrell" < > tls-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > Hi again TLS WG chairs, > > I've done a bit more work on the collection of arguments > against the latest break-TLS proposal. [1] I plan to keep > working on that so more input is welcome. (Corrections > where I've gotten stuff wrong are even more welcome.) > > I'd like to again request some time on the agenda to > allow discussion of those points in a more structured > manner than will be possible during the mic-line scrum > that'll likely follow a sales-pitch for draft-green. > > I'd also like to ask the WG if we think it'd be useful > to document the arguments against that and other "let's > break-tls" proposals we've seen in the past in an RFC. > If people think it would be useful, I'd be willing to > do work to edit such a draft, or help edit that. > > Thanks, > S. > > [1] https://github.com/sftcd/tinfoil > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org] 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497 e: j...@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
