I support allocating a time slot for the arguments against the draft-green (and similar/related approaches).
I also support documenting the above arguments, possibly in a TLS WG draft.
--
Regards,
Uri Blumenthal
On 7/13/17, 08:00, "TLS on behalf of Stephen Farrell" <tls-boun...@ietf.org on
behalf of stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
Hi again TLS WG chairs,
I've done a bit more work on the collection of arguments
against the latest break-TLS proposal. [1] I plan to keep
working on that so more input is welcome. (Corrections
where I've gotten stuff wrong are even more welcome.)
I'd like to again request some time on the agenda to
allow discussion of those points in a more structured
manner than will be possible during the mic-line scrum
that'll likely follow a sales-pitch for draft-green.
I'd also like to ask the WG if we think it'd be useful
to document the arguments against that and other "let's
break-tls" proposals we've seen in the past in an RFC.
If people think it would be useful, I'd be willing to
do work to edit such a draft, or help edit that.
Thanks,
S.
[1] https://github.com/sftcd/tinfoil
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
