On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Kyle Rose <kr...@krose.org> wrote: > > We need to dispel the myth that mere inaction on our part will on its own > prevent implementation of these mechanisms, if for no other reason but to > redirect energy to the political arena where the pervasive monitoring > battles *are* actually fought. > > > Inaction on our part will prevent the code from going into the common > distributions. That's not worthless. > Oh, come on. You've never seen code in a library that implements something that's not in an IETF RFC? --Richard
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
